Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Political Action Forum' started by flashman, Nov 23, 2009.
Agreed on all counts. May you have a merry, white Christmas.
"buttress his argument that "Nature not CO2, rules the climate". The longer such erroneous claims are made without
any form of scientific rebuttal, the more harm is caused."
What "harm" are they talking about?
Why are they interested in "rebutttal"?
TX Red, here is some peer review to digest or inhale or exhale whatever you want to classifiy it as!!!!!!!! Happy New Year!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is some good research Ron. Keep in mind that Dr. Knorr's position is that AGW is real and he does support mandatory caps on emissions. Since you are posting some of his work I assume you "agree" with it and subsequently his views on reducing CO2 emissions.
I would recommend reading all his work and his conclusions based on that. Glad to see science is working as it is supposed to.
TX as I have said before I am open to looking at, reading and learning all, not just one side of an argument. But we can debate this next year. Right now I am going to get ready to take the wife out to a hockey game. Then consume some adult beverage to be determined and then later join some friends.
There will be plenty of time to focus on this later!!!!! Happy New Year to all!!!!!!
Hockey? That explains a lot. LOL. Have fun.
Hey we have a kid from TX playing here on the team! So not all is lost for you guys!!!!!!!
Must me an import. Nobody knows what to do with ice down here unless it comes in a sweet tea.
Well I was wrong we have two kids on the team from TX!!!!! Must know that someday TX will be covered in ice!!!!!
One young man is from Colleyville,TX, the other Whitewright,TX! Met both, nice kids!
1. A parody of Cheaters:
2. On a more serious note, this author proposes that someone file a qui tam action against the advocates of climate change who may have made false statements to get government funds: