How about the other TWO? Now who is refusing to answer?? Nonsense. The root of your entire theory (man evolved from microbes) meets NONE of the criteria. Thats what I'm talking about. I do not dispute evolution within a species. Thats what you are talking about here. Try painting it any way you wish. Seriously, maybe you ought to read the bible. Historical evidence routinely includes ancient literature, business records, and government documents, analyzed in conjunction with linguistics, geography, and archaeological analysis of physical objects (pottery, coins, remains of buildings, etc.), using forensic science techniques. After many man-hours of research and evidence analysis, archaeology has repeatedly confirmed the reliability of the Bible. Of course you would know it that if you read it. It's more probable that a man lived in the belly of a whale, snakes talked, and God spoke to Moses through a burning bush-- than humans evolving from microbes, Nothing created everything, and life spontaneously creating itself. However improbable certain scripture may seem to be, with God anything is possible. So to answer your question directly. I believe everything in the Bible. Yes, I find it hard to believe that a snake talked, and a man lived in the belly of a whale. However, it is possible. Again, far more possible than what you claim because what you claim is ABSOLUTELY impossible. Nothing can not create anything, Life cannot create itself from lifelessness, and humans did not evolve from microbes.