Give Jo a break. I think it's his reading comprehension, again. I posted the crime statistics from the county across the river from a military installation he said he lived across from on another thread. Then he said, no, he doesn't really live across the river from that installation, it's a different one. He obviously pays as much attention to who he's replying to as he does the "facts" of any incident he talks about. Could you imagine the amount of money the government could have saved by hiring a consultant that didn't talk out of both sides of his mouth at the same time, alter the facts to what he wants them to be, then change them again when proven wrong? If his work quality is anything similar to his posting here he was WAY overpaid.