Yes...and ironically Russia is now using this same agreement to justify its invasion of the Crimea because its claiming the United States had interfered in the internal affairs of the Ukraine by supporting the overthrow of their Ukrainian pro-Russian puppet president. I used the term treaty incorrectly as many of the references I researched this with called the "agreement" a treaty. Apparently this "treaty"..."agreement" was so poorly written and open for interpretation that both parties are using it for an excuse "to" and "to not" use it for action. That action is apparently decided on however those involved want to interpret it. Actually, the argument is moot to its interpretation because Russia did annex the Crimea and nobody is going to do anything about it. This agreement is however currently being kicked around the World opposing signatories and talking head media politicos as justification for their own whatever position.