California Flyway Forum Sponsors

5 mallards and CWA

Discussion in 'California Flyway Forum' started by Sweatliner, Apr 4, 2021.

  1. pumpgunner

    pumpgunner Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    4,708
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2004
    Location:
    San Francisco, California
    Sent a pm.

    Against.
     
    lo-base larry likes this.
  2. JuvieCoot

    JuvieCoot Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    12,616
    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Location:
    Surrounded by nuts
    If CWA continues to recommend garbage and non science based bs I will not donate anymore money to them and tell all my buddies not towaste their Money also@Rocque Merlo

    Don’t want to
    Give my email, or any crap
     
  3. Avg Joe

    Avg Joe Senior Refuge Member

    Messages:
    680
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Location:
    CA
    Thanks Sweatliner for giving us a voice.
    Thanks to Rocque Merlo for coming on to the forum to explain what happened and how we can try to fix it.
    Thanks to all for coming on here and remaining civil.
    I kill about 3 mallards a year so this does not affect me personally. I still believe in sticking with science so that means keep the 7 bird limit.
    It would appear that high dollar clubs will have a member kill more green than me in one day than what I do in a season. The big dollar clubs can easily self regulate themselves to 4 or 5 mallards a day and "save" more mallards than regulating the other 95% to 99% of the hunters out there.

    CWA should focus on nesting habitat, Klamath Basin, and fair chase. We do not need another spinner debate but we need science to recommend what we can do to take the pressure off of local mallards, retain the ones that migrate here, and provide refuge habitat to help the Average Joe have a chance at a few more greenheads.
     
  4. Refugeguy

    Refugeguy Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    4,435
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2017
    Location:
    Clovis
    Shows what morons these Guys are if
    A bunch of emails change there mind .. Shouldn’t be making any recommendations of there so easily swayed .. dip shi.ts
     
  5. black&blueshoulder

    black&blueshoulder Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    6,636
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Location:
    NorCal
    Against the mallard limit proposal that deviates from the science presented.

    Jeremy Gibbons
    [email protected]
    CWA member
     
    lo-base larry likes this.
  6. Another Mike

    Another Mike Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    3,908
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Location:
    California
    Against the process used by the “committee”.

    Michael A. Russell

    [email protected]

    CWA member
     
    lo-base larry likes this.
  7. Wood-Dro

    Wood-Dro Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    10,772
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Location:
    East Bay
    Seeing some of the people on the board it doesn't really surprise me.
     
  8. Whatever

    Whatever Senior Refuge Member

    Messages:
    372
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2015
    Negotiate a 5 bird limit on mallards for an increase in pintail. What do we see more of these days? Science is what got us the pintail limits...it's what got us climate change. Science by definition is a moving target...but I'm against the interference in manipulating nature.
     
    thomakr, tule and Tommyo like this.
  9. intheblind99

    intheblind99 New Member

    Messages:
    28
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Location:
    california
    Against the 5 mallard limit
    Pm sent
     
    lo-base larry likes this.
  10. Norcal Ducker

    Norcal Ducker Refuge Member

    Messages:
    37
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2017
    Location:
    Northern California
    Against the 5 mallard limit. Not sure if its too late.

    Killian O'Brien
    [email protected]
    CWA member
     
    lo-base larry likes this.

Share This Page