Arbery murder defendants guilty

Discussion in 'Political Action Forum' started by French Creek Fowler, Nov 24, 2021.

  1. French Creek Fowler

    French Creek Fowler Refuge Member

    Messages:
    61
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2017
    No trolling, just putting it out there as a post, just was done as was with Rittenhouse
     
  2. Bclick

    Bclick Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    2,929
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2020
    Location:
    Spring Green
    Effective grifting requires many writeoffs for travel lodging and meals. Dude is a parasite, always has been.
     
  3. Steelshot Scott

    Steelshot Scott Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    2,270
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Location:
    NC
    There are no similarities between this shooting and the Rittenhouse case.

    First of all, let me preface this with the fact the "unarmed jogger" was not a jogger. He was rifling through houses that were under construction when a construction crew rolled up on the house and gave chase. So the only jogging he did was to flee the scene.

    But what those three idiots did was stupid when they chased him down. If they had chased him away, scared the hell out of him and let it go, it would have likely solved the problem of at least that kid stealing their stuff. But when they chased him down and caught him, they were no in a no win situation.

    It would have been a justified shooting, if these three idiots had been cops. If cops were detaining him and he went for the gun, it would have been self-defense. But this is a situation they made by chasing him down and forcing the confrontation. , Ga. had a citizen's arrest law AT THE TIME OF THE SHOOTING. But, it was stupid to do this at this time, in that situation. Once the kid ran away, you have to let him go. He no longer poses a threat.

    This was the argument that was used in the Trayvon Martin case. Zimmerman was not a cop, lefties said. That is true he wasn't a cop. But he didn't initiate the contact, he merely was following a suspicious character. He wasn't trying to take him into custody. He wasn't confronting Trayvon Martin, he was following him. Trayvon Martin doubled back and ambushed him, and was in the process of beating him to death on the sidewalk when he fired the fatal shot.

    Each case must be evaluated individually. Self defense is self evident if you are capable of independent, cognizant thought.
     
  4. CookMan

    CookMan Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    6,037
    Joined:
    May 29, 2015
    Location:
    AL
    It Never Does! Must be some money to be made for his racist azz to show up. He still owes the USA / America and the IRS $4M in taxes!
     
    lugnut, Bclick and hunting1 like this.
  5. lamsen95240

    lamsen95240 Senior Refuge Member

    Messages:
    571
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2014
    Location:
    California
  6. API

    API PAF-CA Flyway Moderator

    Messages:
    40,994
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Location:
    SoCal
    Indeed. Trying to craft and parse a “one size fits all” standard is a fool’s errand.
     
  7. French Creek Fowler

    French Creek Fowler Refuge Member

    Messages:
    61
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2017
    Not a fan of the reverend, but I see no difference between the GOP clambering to make and intern out of Rittenhouse or the adulation from the former president and what he does
     
  8. stump

    stump Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    6,616
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2002
    Location:
    Port Orchard WA.
    I have to imagine you have proof of that accusation. Not how i read any of the reports...
     
  9. Steelshot Scott

    Steelshot Scott Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    2,270
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Location:
    NC
    Ah, your back.

    During the trial, the defendants introduced CCTV footage of Arbery going through other houses under construction. When the 3 idiots rolled up on the house they were working on, Arbery came running out of the house and they gave chase. I saw the footage on the news one night.

    It had no effect on the trial, doesn't matter if he was stealing, you can't legal chase a thief down and shoot him. Just isn't legal. Also, due to the heavy theft from the houses under construction, the crews were using those big,heavy metal toolboxes(the ones you need a forklift to move) to store tools and supplies in. He didn't steal anything. So it was irrelevant to the trial.

    The news media wouldn't have covered it anyway, even if it was relevant(which it isn't). Much like the Christmas parade murderer, the 3 major networks,CNN and MSNBC are ignoring the driver(who was black) and focusing on his vehicle(a SUV). To cover the fact that he was looking for stuff to steal didn't fit their narrative. So I saw the footage once, then never again, not even on FOX(even though FOX is where I saw the footage the one time)

    https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/ne...nder-construction/ZR6VFJ6HHFFJRAHL6HRTKGSDKA/


    It doesn't matter that Arbery was not a jogger. Doesn't matter if he was just looking around.Doesn't matter if he was in there filming porno movies.

    Once he ran out of the house, the defendants could not legally give chase or detain him.

    I think the charge they committed was manslaughter, not murder. I don't think they intended to kill him. I think they thought when they pulled out the gun, the guy would give up and they would "put him under citizen's arrest". That is the problem with pulling out a gun, once it comes out, you may have to use it if the guy doesn't give up.

    Those three idiots had no defense for what happened. The two that shot Arbery broke the law, the idiot that filmed it was guilty by participating just like a getaway driver is guilty of murder if the counter man kills a bank clerk.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2021 at 7:10 AM
  10. pintail2222

    pintail2222 Elite Refuge Member

    Messages:
    36,018
    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Location:
    Collier Co. Florida

Share This Page