FBI has raided Trump’s Mar a Lago home.

bill cooksey

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2000
Messages
23,338
Reaction score
26,947
Location
Bartlett, Tn., USA
What we have a raid on a former US President. This has never happened, not even to Nixon.

The FBI is refusing to release the reason for the raid, they are refusing to release a inventory of items taken, they refused to let Trump's lawyers be present during the search and they went through personal items including Melania Trump's clothes.

This was a fishing expedition. There is no theory on this, it is clearly evident and anyone saying otherwise is being disingenuous.

I believe you are most likely correct. Has nothing to do with what I wrote. Anyone saying otherwise is twisting words to support their personal opinion.
 

Ruination

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
7,574
Reaction score
3,661
Location
Maryland

pintail2222

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
38,934
Reaction score
32,532
Location
Collier Co. Florida
So a conspiracy theory can be proven then.
We were told Hunter Biden's laptop was a conspiracy theory back in 2020. "Don't believe it"... "It's just a lie to make Joe Biden look bad"... "It's Russian disinformation"...

The New York Post was even banned from Twitter so that it's story regarding the authenticity of the Hunter Biden Laptop could not be spread.


OCTOBER 21, 2020

Twitter, Facebook Allow Pizzagate-Esque Conspiracy Theories to Spread About Hunter Biden

Abhorrent, baseless conspiracy theories are swirling around the vice-president’s son that have largely gone unchecked​


OCTOBER 29, 2020
NBC:
A 64-page document asserting an elaborate conspiracy theory involving Joe Biden's son and business in China, that was later disseminated by close associates ...


 
Last edited:

capefearflyfox

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
2,618
Location
NC
Maybe not so much a conspiracy theory after all...

SOURCE: https://justthenews.com/politics-po...y-subpoena-spring-voluntarily-cooperated-home

Questions grow about Trump raid after revelation of grand jury subpoena, extensive cooperation​

Trump got spring grand jury subpoena, gathered documents, turned them over and allowed agents to search storage locker the FBI later raided.

Two months before his Florida home was raided by the FBI, former President Donald Trump secretly received a grand jury subpoena for classified documents belonging to the National Archives, and voluntarily cooperated by turning over responsive evidence, surrendering security surveillance footage and allowing federal agents and a senior Justice Department lawyer to tour his private storage locker, according to a half dozen people familiar with the incident.

While the cooperation was mostly arranged by his lawyers, Trump personally surprised the DOJ National Security Division prosecutor and three FBI agents who came to his Mar-a-Lago compound on June 3, greeting them as they came to pick up a small number of documents compliant with the subpoena, the sources told Just the News, speaking only on condition of anonymity because the visit was covered by grand jury secrecy.

The subpoena requested any remaining documents Trump possessed with any classification markings, even if they involved photos of foreign leaders, correspondence or mementos from his presidency.

Secret Service agents were also present and facilitated the visit, officials said.

Trump signaled his full cooperation, telling the agents and prosecutor, "Look, whatever you need let us know," according to two eyewitnesses. The federal team was surprised by the president's invitation and asked for an immediate favor: to see the 6-foot-by-10-foot storage locker where his clothes, shoes, documents and mementos from his presidency were stored at the compound.

Given Trump's instruction, the president's lawyers complied and allowed the search by the FBI before the entourage left cordially. Five days later, DOJ officials sent a letter to Trump's lawyers asking them to secure the storage locker with more than the lock they had seen. The Secret Service installed a more robust security lock to comply.

Around the same time, the Trump Organization, which owns Mar-a-Lago, received a request for surveillance video footage covering the locker and volunteered the footage to federal authorities, sources disclosed.

The disclosure Wednesday to Just the News raised immediate new questions in legal and congressional circles about the necessity for the subsequent raid, including whether the judge who approved the warrant new of the earlier cooperation.

“The more we learn, the more confusing this gets,” George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley told Fox News program Hannity. “….Did they relay this history to the magistrate? That, according to these sources, that the president had cooperated.

”I mean, the idea that he was subject to a subpoena, complied with a subpoena, didn't challenge it, voluntarily showed the storage room to the agents, followed their advice, secured it to meet their demands. All of that is hardly a basis for saying now we need to send in 40 FBI agents on a on a raid,” he added. “I mean, if the subpoena worked the first time, then presumably a second subpoena would work the second time if there were remaining documents.”

Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., told Just the News that Trump mentioned to her Tuesday night the prior cooperation, and that she viewed the raid as an effort at nullifying his future run for the presidency in 2024 if he chooses.

“Look, this is exactly what people, the public is seeing: a two-tiered justice system. This is impeachment 4,” she said, citing Trump‘s prior two impeachments and the January 6 hearings that preceded the raid.

The flurry of cooperation in June came months after Trump had already returned about 15 boxes of documents, many of them classified, at the request of the National Archives. Government officials have said the documents were mistakenly boxed up by the General Services Administration along with Trump's personal possessions from the White House and shipped to Mar-a -Lago.

After the subpoena was delivered in late May, federal authorities said they suspected there were more classified materials still left at Mar-a-Lago, and arranged the June 3 visit.

After mid-June, the government had no other official contacts with the president's lawyers until agents showed up unannounced on Monday and executed the search warrant, ousting the president's lawyers and staff and spending nine hours collecting evidence. Sources told Just the News they collected about 12 boxes of evidence.

U.S. officials who confirmed the June 3 voluntary visit and subpoena compliance, refused to say whether U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart was apprised of the full extent of Trump's compliance when he was asked to sign the unprecedented search warrant last Friday.

The FBI then waited three days after getting the judge's approval before executing the warrant, one of many oddities in the timetable.

Some officials said the extra time was used to assemble a team to raid Mar-a-Lago in the most incognito manner so the public wouldn't be alerted and while the former president was out of town.

The officials told Just the News the search warrant was sought after the FBI obtained some witness information and other evidence suggesting some classified documents may have still remained on the property after June, stored in locations such as a private safe Trump had in his residence, and that some of the storage locations may have been accessed in 2022.

The new revelations came the same day that new questions arose about Reinhart, the judge in the case.

Just the News obtained a court document showing that Reinhart — just six weeks before signing the warrant — recused himself from Trump's lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and other Democrats in the Russia collusion scandal, citing concerns he couldn't be impartial.


Reinhart, appointed in 2018 as a federal magistrate in West Palm Beach, Fla., filed the recusal document on June 22, a few weeks after presiding over the start of the civil litigation.

"The undersigned Magistrate Judge, to whom the above-styled cause has been assigned, hereby recuses himself and refers the case to the Clerk of Court for reassignment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455," Reinhart wrote in his order of recusal in the Trump v. Clinton case.

You can read the document here:

File
show_temp (7).pdf

The statute that the magistrate cited for his recusal states in part that a judge "shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned" and then describes the various circumstances that could trigger such concerns.


They include "a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts" or prior work as a lawyer for a party involved in the case.

Reinhart's order did not specify the conflict or source of the concern prompting his recusal.

Trump's lawsuit accuses Clinton, Democrat allies and current and former government officials of engaging in a racketeering conspiracy to falsely portray Trump as colluding with Russia during the 2016 election. The sweeping nature of the suit involves numerous parties and public figures.

The recusal filing emerges as numerous media reports have surfaced about the magistrate's prior work, including donations before he was judge to President Barack Obama and Jeb Bush and work for figures associated with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.


The Daily Wire also raised questions about Reinhart's impartiality toward Trump, reporting that in a 2017 Facebook social post — a year before he was named a magistrate — he challenged the 45th president's moral character after Trump attacked the late Rep. John Lewis, a civil rights icon.

"I generally ignore the President-elect's tweets, but not this one," Reinhart posted, according to the Daily Wire. "John Lewis arguably has done more to 'make America great' than any living citizen. Last August, I took my son to the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma so he could understand the kind of courage and sacrifice required to live in a democratic society. John Lewis embodies that spirit. Although I've never met him, he is one of my heroes.

"Thank you, Robert Reich, for saying what many of us feel, 'John Lewis is the conscience of America. Donald Trump doesn't have the moral stature to kiss John Lewis's feet.'

"Or, as Joseph Welch said to Joseph McCarthy, 'At long last, have you left no sense of decency?'"
 

Steelshot Scott

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
4,152
Reaction score
5,472
Location
NC
I believe you are most likely correct. Has nothing to do with what I wrote. Anyone saying otherwise is twisting words to support their personal opinion.
I didn't say that is what you said. I was taking what you said and expounding on it.
 

Ruination

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
7,574
Reaction score
3,661
Location
Maryland
Do you understand the word theory?

A theory is a unproven hypothesis.

If you keep asking the same question, over and over, it leads to a theory on my part.

You might be obtuse.

Do you understand you used the word "unproveable" lol?

You, the king of asking the same question over and over again...
 

Steelshot Scott

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
4,152
Reaction score
5,472
Location
NC
Do you understand you used the word "unproveable" lol?

You, the king of asking the same question over and over again...
When it is proven, it ceases to be a theory.

Thus, Global Warming Theory. Unproven.

Law of Gravity. Proven.
 

Ruination

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
7,574
Reaction score
3,661
Location
Maryland
Well, I guess the theory that "Steel Shot Scott can't admit he is wrong or made a simple mistake" has enough data to be labeled proven.

It is now a fact.

good day.
 

Steelshot Scott

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
4,152
Reaction score
5,472
Location
NC
I have been wrong before.

Once I thought I was mistaken on something, but it turned out I was wrong about that.
 

Latest posts

Top