Trump, Hush Money and a Porn Star

JP

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2000
Messages
17,132
Reaction score
10,432
Location
Indian Territory, Oklahoma
Didn’t this Mattress Actress lose a defamation cause of action to DJT, to the tune of $300K+ ?
 

Missy Skeeter

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
1,617
Reaction score
2,066
Location
Alaska
Yet here we are.
Our country is in tatters, zero borders, Bidens proven China collusion, and here you are pissing/moaning about Trump?
No simply pointing out from a legal perspective, the case would be weak:
1)The mechanism to indict as a felony is problematic.
NY State has no jurisdiction over Federal election laws.
And the campaign was for a federal election, so NY State election laws would be moot.

2) The prime witness, Michael Cohen has been convicted of perjury.
In 2018, he plead guilty to lying to Congress.
It could be argued that the prime witness has a history of lying under oath, and is vindictive towards Trump. In March 2019, Cohen sued the Trump Organization to cover the $1.9 million in financial penalties plus an additional $1.9 million in his unpaid defense costs. He argued that the Trump Organization—which had already paid $1.7 million for his defense—had agreed to indemnify him.

3) There is no evidence that the hush money was a campaign expense.
It could be argued it was simply hush money so Trump's wife would not learn about the affair with a porn star.
 

Larry Welch

Senior Refuge Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
996
Reaction score
2,090
Location
ENC
I feel like this a disguise covering up something else that we'll hear about down the road.
 

Grif

Elite Refuge Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
18,142
Reaction score
49,801
They got him this time. :l :l :l

What a damn joke these lib elected/installed DA's are.
 

lugnut

Elite Refuge Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
7,148
Reaction score
10,015
Location
cali
No simply pointing out from a legal perspective, the case would be weak:
1)The mechanism to indict as a felony is problematic.
NY State has no jurisdiction over Federal election laws.
And the campaign was for a federal election, so NY State election laws would be moot.

2) The prime witness, Michael Cohen has been convicted of perjury.
In 2018, he plead guilty to lying to Congress.
It could be argued that the prime witness has a history of lying under oath, and is vindictive towards Trump. In March 2019, Cohen sued the Trump Organization to cover the $1.9 million in financial penalties plus an additional $1.9 million in his unpaid defense costs. He argued that the Trump Organization—which had already paid $1.7 million for his defense—had agreed to indemnify him.

3) There is no evidence that the hush money was a campaign expense.
It could be argued it was simply hush money so Trump's wife would not learn about the affair with a porn star.
What affair?

 
Top