Mountain Duck
Elite Refuge Member
Why are these school shooters drawn to AR's? Granted it's tactical advantage over other platforms in urban combat is apparent, but why would it be advantageous on the softest of targets?
Are these shooters intent on shooting up school children, or are they intent on shooting up school children.... with an AR -15?
I never see this question asked, yet it's implied by the media and the left, that the AR-15 possesses some unique firepower that allows it to be extra deadly in a school shooting, when every duck hunter on this board knows an 870 would be equally as devastating in a school room. Yet almost without fail, they use an AR. Is their mere existence a drawing force for these whackos? If they were magically banned and disappeared, would school shootings stop? The firepower would still exist, albeit a different platform.
Obvious leftist political agendas aside (they ultimately want to ban all guns), I never see this discussed anywhere, but it seems extremely relevant to the school shooting discussion.
Are these shooters intent on shooting up school children, or are they intent on shooting up school children.... with an AR -15?
I never see this question asked, yet it's implied by the media and the left, that the AR-15 possesses some unique firepower that allows it to be extra deadly in a school shooting, when every duck hunter on this board knows an 870 would be equally as devastating in a school room. Yet almost without fail, they use an AR. Is their mere existence a drawing force for these whackos? If they were magically banned and disappeared, would school shootings stop? The firepower would still exist, albeit a different platform.
Obvious leftist political agendas aside (they ultimately want to ban all guns), I never see this discussed anywhere, but it seems extremely relevant to the school shooting discussion.