JP
Elite Refuge Member
In your first sentence, you are conflating asking for permission to trespass with paying for trespass while operating a for-profit business. Apples to oranges.Worrying about a farmer’s exposure if a hunter is injured is a silly, misplaced argument. What freelancer knocks on a farmer’s door and presents a copy of his insurance certificate and a hold-harmless agreement. If you don’t do it why should an outfitter?
Do I believe an outfitter should be licensed, carry sufficient insurance and pay withholding on his employees? Of course I do. But that’s for the state and Feds to regulate, not you.
And leasing land to a single entity makes perfect sense for the farmer. He can negotiate insurance and land usage with the individual lessee or the outfitter. And he knows who to look to if his field is rutted up or trash left behind.
T
And why the flap about how much money the outfitter is making? If he’s running a legal business, more power to him. No different than any business a poster here might run.
I get outfitting and leasing are interfering with your freelancing freebie. Mine too. But you gotta come up with worthy arguments against it. Just being a blue-collar weekend hunter and being cut out of your hobby isn’t going to cut it.
I lease ground and have gone on G/O hunts. In those instances a legal agreement was executed with the lessor and the G/O's were registered and carried liability coverage as they were legitimate operations, not a wildcatter skating around.